Machiavelli Discourses Essay

inwardly the Machiavellis Republic, a prince should be the sole ascendancy of the state and should have a main part in ascertain every aspect of the state and the policies being established by the state. The best interests of the prince are gaining, maintaining, and expanding his regimeal powers or views. Since the prince is the sole authority, he has the power over everything and everyone. Machiavelli speaks virtually this in his loudnesss The Prince and The Discourses. In The Prince, Machiavelli concerned about the principality of the state and the Princes role within the sovereign state. Men worry slight about doing an spot to one who makes himself loved than to one who makes himself feared. The bond of love is one which men, wretched creatures they are, break when it is to their advantage to do so but fear is strengthened by a dread of punishment which is always in effect(p) ( Prince, p 87). Within this quote, Machiavelli describes a man as self-centered and selfish in a way.Within this republic, the prince needs to willingly deceive its citizens in order to win honor. He says that a citizen should have shade trust within the prince therefore a prince should deceive himself in front of the citizens to confront the public what they want. Machiavellis sole purpose was to help prince maintain his power for the undecomposed of its citizens. In the Discourses, his main interest is to bring through the liberty and independence of its citizens. He says that the prince is the foundation of the state. The prince has the ultimate power of veto and the only way to redeem rid of the prince is to kill him. From time to time, state needs constant transformation in the change of the transformation. redeeming(prenominal) laws are not enough to keep the survival of the republic. If the republic becomes corrupt, the prince can kill people for the good of the state, public trial and public execution. It is called truth and reconciliation trial.Everyone who is responsible for the corruption agrees to their wrong and they are pardoned by the one in charge. We keep the prince occupied by sending him to campaign. The prince should always be studying the warfare or fighting the war. The prince is the ruler that must stay in power. He has a role in the founding of the republic in The Discourses. He must maintain the equity in the city. He defines impartiality as the way one accomplishes his goals. In his book, he has a fight against the prince. For Machiavelli, power characteristically defines political activity, and hence it is necessary for any successful ruler to know howpower is to be used. He believes the resembling for a prince. He should know his duties for the country and how to carry out laws within the country. Machiavelli believes that individuals are brought to the world to result and will the ruler be able to maintain the state in safety and tribute. Without exception the authority of states and their laws will neer be ac knowledged when they are not supported by a show of power which renders obedience inescapable.The prince is the sole power of the state. He believes like the prince with the highest virtue is capable of authority. In his opinion, virtue is the most important aspect of authority. In the Discourses, Machiavelli describes his political personal beliefs of the republic. In particular, across the two works, Machiavelli consistently and clearly distinguishes between a tokenish and a full conception of political or urbane order, and thus constructs a hierarchy of ends within his general account of communal life (Machiavelli, 2008). A minimal civil order is one in which a strong government holds both the people and nobleness and helps them live peacefully. He believes that a strong government is a key to a successful state and prince is the highest authority of the government. As for the rest, for whom it is enough to live securely (vivere sicuro), they are easily satisfied by fashioning orders and laws that, along with the power of the king, comprehend everyones security.And once a prince does this, and the people see that he never breaks such laws, they will shortly begin to live securely (vivere sicuro) and contentedly, (Machiavelli, 2008) Machiavelli says about the prince. According to Machiavelli, a law- enduring character like the prince comprehends a states security. With that said, a prince is always willing and ready to go to war in order to protect his state. Machiavelli loves France and always gives examples of Frances kingdom in his book. The kingdom of France is moderated to a greater extent by laws than any other kingdom of which at our time we have knowledge, Machiavelli declares (Machiavelli, 2008). In his view, whatever benefits may accrue to a state by denying a militarys role to the people is of less importance than the absence of liberty that necessarily accompanies such disarmament (Machiavelli, 2008).The prince is in charge of the military a t all propagation and by this quote, it shows that a prince is always willing to go to war in times of hardship. The princes key role is to bring virtue to the state as discussed earlier. He cares the most about virtue in the book and talksabout how the divine power should bring virtue within the state. He speaks more about the role of the prince in his book The Prince, instead of the Discourses. It is peoples certificate of indebtedness to obey the prince and help him in times of war. He speaks much about the war in his book and his main goal is war. Machiavelli is assertive that citizens will always fight for their liberty and freedom against internal as well as external oppressors.Indeed, this is precisely why the succeeding French monarchs left their people disarmed. They pursue to sustain public security and order. This security and order for them means the elimination of any opportunities for their subjects to their arms. The French regime, because it seeks security above a ll else (for the people as well as for their rulers), cannot permit what Machiavelli takes to be a ancient means of promoting liberty(Machiavelli, 2008).The portrayal of Machiavellis republic is one of a kind and related to reality. The politicians in todays world have similar traits and act in a similar manner. A man, who stated his theory on the republic hundreds of years ago, still has people who agree with him. The ways governments duties are defined by Machiavelli havent changed much since the years. The government is the same, the peoples attitudes are the same, and the only thing that has been changed is the time.Works CitedMachiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince and the Discourses. Toronto Random House, Inc., 1950. Print. Nerdman, Cary. Niccolo Machiavelli. Stanford Encyclopedia. Stanford University. September 2008. Web. 6 December, 2012.